It is reasonable to argue that, governmental institutions...

It is reasonable to argue that, governmental institutions or people with authority are subject to withhold a great deal of information from society. Many may argue that secrets are kept to ensure the safety of the nation. Thus, upholding the governmental duty of protecting the nation against possible threats. On the other hand, many believe that secrets may exist which violate our constitutional rights. Over the last year, Edward Snowden, has made headline news for leaking sensitive governmental information to the press. Edward Snowden is a 29-year-old high school drop-out, who was a tech specialist for the National Security Association. Snowden had discovered and later exposed the NSA for monitoring the nations e-mails, phone calls, and†¦show more content†¦Furthermore, the government should not be allowed to access our personal data without our consent. It is unconstitutional to search or obtain information without probable cause or a search warrant. In this case, the NSA has no probable cause, nor a search warrant to spy on Americans and invade their privacy. In addition, it is fair to argue that Edward Snowden is not a traitor because he demonstrated the highest respect for American law. In MLK’s Letter from a Birmingham Jail, he said, individuals who break the law because they know it’s unjust, are actually respecting the law because they demand justice. Even though, Edward Snowden probably violated the NSA rules by exposing their secret, he did it out of good intentions. It is unjust and illegal to spy on citizens without probably cause or a search warrant. In order to protect the people, Edward Snowden jeopardized his life to expose the unlawful actions exercised by the NSA. Snowden holds high moral values, respected America, and its laws so much that he broke the laws to prove the unlawful actions of the NSA. On the other hand, some believe that, Edward Snowden was a traitor for exposing sensitive information to the public because it can purpose possible harm to the American people. However, according to the Washington Post, Edward said, â€Å"I carefully evaluated every single document I disclosed to ensure that each was legitimately in the public interest.† (Naskashima). Thus,Show MoreRelatedDemocracy By Robert Dahl : Democracy1518 Words   |  7 PagesNick Through the study of human history it is evident authoritative and monarch governments prevailed as legitimate authorities but with careful considerations these political systems were seen as inaccurate by many. New political systems, functions and responsibilities soon began to surface. Democracy was among these new political systems and argues for the influence of citizens in politics and the protection of rights (Dahl, 1998, p. 44). Democracy can be found through many politicalRead More Intrinsic Human Dignity and Equality in Relation to Liberal Democracy 1748 Words   |  7 PagesLiberal democracy is prevalent in the West. This political arrangement guarantees the rights of a people in relation to their government. Many Westerners, unfortunately, cannot give a philosophical explanation and/or justification for it. Ultimately, an examination of liberal democracy will demonstrate that it rests on notions of human dignity, equality and happiness, which are not recent developments i n philosophy, but have their origins in classical and scholastic thought. It is in said examinationRead MoreEssay on Machiavelli and the Roman Empire1489 Words   |  6 Pageslasciviousness,quot; prompting the people to overthrow him to rid themselves of his tyranny. An aristocracy, which Machiavelli means as a rule of the Good, then takes control, but shortly thereafter they too succumb to the temptation of exploiting their power. Again, the masses must usurp the rule of the few and, still remembering what events had transpired in the past, they keep the power for themselves and establish a popular state. In spite of their good intentions, the people soon find they cant keepRead MoreImpact Of The Human Rights Act 1998 On Clinical1924 Words   |  8 Pagesprofessionally and amended. In attempt to explore the impact of the HRA 1998 on clinical negligence this essay examines the reasons for integration of the HRA and issues it came with and compares various types of negligence, l iability of public authorities and remedies before and after the HRA came into force. The main difference between the HRA and the ECHR is that the former is the domestic legislation and the latter is an international agreement. The reason for incorporating the ECHR into EnglishRead MoreEssay on The Patriot Act: Keeping America Safe1920 Words   |  8 PagesAct, was passed. The Act was approved by both the House of Representatives and Senate with very little opposition and was signed into law by President George W. Bush. This new act significantly cut restrictions on judicial power and gave legal authorities more control. Since its passage, the Patriot Act has been under severe scrutiny and has been considered one the most controversial acts passed under the American government. Most adversaries have critiqued the act by claiming that it is unconstitutionalRead MoreThe Acquisition, Use, And Disposition Of School Property8925 Words   |  36 Pagesdisposition of school district property. The study includes an analysis of 84 court cases involving litigation from a variety of states and court jurisdictions. The cases briefed in this study are clustered into subtopics to include the general authority of school districts to acquire, use, and dispose of real property in accordance with applicable federal or state laws. iii DEDICATION As with most worthy intellectual pursuits, this research study took an extraordinary amount of time and effortRead MoreThe Patient Protection Affordable Care Act Of 20102006 Words   |  9 Pageseither $95 or 1% of applicable income, whichever was greater; the penalty then increased to$325 or 2% of applicable income in 2015. Studies have shown that the individual mandate will reduce the number of uninsured Americans, lower premiums for people buying insurance in the individual and small-group markets, and reduce the government s cost of funding coverage for newly insured individuals. If the mandate was enacted in 2012 it would have affected about 26 million Americans who were currentlyRead MoreStatutory Construction Cases3663 Words   |  15 PagesPaat v. CA; People v. Mapa; Paras v. Comelec; Daoang v. Municipal Judge of San Nicolas) 1. National Federation of Labor v. Eisma Construction is required to determine jurisdiction. The first and fundamental duty of courts is to apply the law. Construction and interpretation come only after it has been demonstrated that application is impossible or inadequate without them. However, jurisdiction over the subject matter in a judicial proceeding is conferred by the sovereign authority, which organizesRead MoreEssay about Same Sex Marriage Controversy in the United States3686 Words   |  15 Pages In a very real sense, it is reasonable to argue that the government should have no say at all in the processes of marriage, or decide which adults may or may not legally marry. State and federal governments play a role, of course, in that marriage is a civil union, and provides benefits and legal protections for the couple. Historically, marriage serves the interests of the society by promoting stability and future generations of citizens, and governments usually act in ways to promote this veryRead MoreAliens : An Alien Who Arrives At The Nation s Borders7568 Words à ‚  |  31 PagesDivision Chief John Lafferty, presented an updated Asylum Division Officer Training Course (ADOTC), which included lesson plans on Credible Fear of Persecution and Torture Determinations, and Reasonable Fear of Persecution and Torture Determinations. The aim of the plan is to revise the credible and reasonable fear standard of asylum during screening, and make it consistent with the Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements, Executive Order 13767 released on January 25, 2017. The lesson